Information Quality in Latin American Digital Native Media
Analysis Based on Structured Dimensions and Indicators
Evaluating Information Quality in Latin American Digital Native Media
What is this article about?
This article explains the level of information quality in Latin American digital native news media, using a structured model of ten journalistic quality indicators. Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Rivera-Rogel, and Romero-Rodríguez analyze media from 20 countries, applying an integrated framework based on sources, presentation, opinion diversity, and use of data.
Why is it important?
The article highlights that while digital native media contribute to pluralism and innovation, their content often lacks depth, verification, and audience interaction. The findings are crucial to rethink digital journalism standards, enhance media literacy, and ensure public trust in emerging information ecosystems.
Key Findings
1. Mixed performance on journalistic standards
-
High-scoring outlets: Chequeado (Argentina), Aristegui Noticias (Mexico), CR Hoy (Costa Rica)
-
Weakest dimensions: data use (32.5%) and audience interaction (52.5%)
2. Lack of investigative routines
-
Many outlets rely on other media or agencies
-
Few conduct original investigations or direct interviews
-
“Unisourcism” and lack of contrast dominate
3. Opinion sections reveal ideological imbalance
-
Most media include opinion pages, but few offer diverse viewpoints
-
Exceptions: 14 y medio, Confidencial, and El Cooperante stand in opposition to national regimes
4. Use of multimedia is uneven
-
Photos are common, but infographics and videos are underused
-
Only a handful use full multimedia and data journalism formats
Methodology
-
Sample: 20 digital native outlets across Latin America
-
Model: 10 indicators across content, sourcing, opinion, stats, headlines, etc.
-
Time frame: Constructed week method (Aug–Oct 2019)
-
Tools: Expert judgment and scoring from validated models (Romero-Rodríguez et al.)
FAQs
Q: What are digital native media?
A: Outlets born online with no traditional media background—often agile, low-cost, and highly localized.
Q: What does “unisourcism” mean?
A: Relying on one or two sources, limiting content richness and verification.
Q: Why is the use of stats important?
A: It strengthens data-driven journalism, essential for credibility and depth.
Q: Which country had the lowest score?
A: El Cooperante (Venezuela), with just 23 points out of 50.
Rodríguez-Hidalgo, C., Rivera-Rogel, D. & Romero-Rodriguez, L.M. (2020). Information Quality in Latin American Digital Native Media: Analysis Based on Structured Dimensions and Indicators. Media and Communication, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2657