Tratamiento informativo sobre el suicidio
en medios digitales iberoamericanos
Suicide Reporting in Ibero-America: Media Fails and Fixes
What is it?
This study analyzes how news media in 20 Ibero-American countries report on suicide, evaluating whether they follow WHO-PAHO guidelines for responsible journalism on mental health and self-harm.
Why is it important?
This article explains that improper reporting on suicide can lead to copycat behavior and stigmatization, especially when the narrative includes method details or personal drama. According to the research of Tejedor, Romero-Rodríguez, Martínez, and Rull, most media outlets still fail to educate the public or guide people on how to seek help.
Key Findings from the Study
Methodology
-
Content and framing analysis of 1,226 news items from top media outlets in 20 countries.
-
Based on WHO-PAHO’s 2023 guide “Preventing Suicide: A Resource for Media Professionals”.
-
Mixed-method design: quantitative content coding and qualitative case analysis.
Quantitative Insights
-
48% of news explained suicide as a multifactorial issue (aligning with guidelines).
-
80% included educational content, but only a minority indicated where or how to seek help.
-
Most reports used mixed sources: experts and family/friends.
-
Negative coverage of expert sources was often paired with negative portrayals of victims’ families.
Qualitative Insights
-
Many news stories still violate guidelines by:
-
Describing methods in detail.
-
Using sensationalist language.
-
Simplifying causes (e.g., blaming a breakup).
-
-
Best practices included:
-
Neutral tone.
-
Expert advice.
-
Help resources.
-
Transmedia storytelling (video, infographic, directories).
-
What’s Wrong with Current Suicide Reporting?
Common Mistakes
-
Detailing the method of suicide.
-
Romanticizing or dramatizing the narrative.
-
Blaming individuals or isolating a single cause.
-
Lacking information on mental health support.
Ethical Dilemmas
The study highlights a key tension: how do journalists raise awareness in resource-scarce settings (e.g., Guatemala, Argentina) where help may not be available, without resorting to catastrophism?
FAQs
What are the WHO-PAHO suicide reporting guidelines?
They are 14 recommendations that advise journalists to avoid detailing methods, provide help information, and use respectful, contextualized language.
How well are Ibero-American media following them?
Not very well. While some progress has been made, especially in portraying multifactorial causes, most reports still lack actionable guidance for readers.
Which countries performed better?
Examples of best practices were found in Paraguay (ABC Color) and Argentina (La Nación), where articles included expert input and crisis resources.
Final Thoughts
The main findings indicate that while some improvements exist, especially in recognizing suicide’s complexity, media coverage remains problematic. Newsrooms need better training, ethical sensitivity, and structural support to produce stories that inform without harming.
This study urges:
-
Journalism schools to improve mental health training.
-
Media outlets to adopt WHO-PAHO standards.
-
Further national studies for in-depth media audits.
Tejedor S., Romero-Rodríguez L. M., Martínez J. y Rull Ribó D. (2025). Cobertura del suicidio en medios iberoamericanos: Análisis de contenido y encuadre informativo . Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 31(1), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.5209/emp.97778