La televisión como espejo de la realidad del «bullying»
Percepciones de los adolescentes sobre el programa «Proyecto Bullying»
How Teens Respond to Television Portrayals of Bullying
What is it?
This article explains a qualitative study on how Spanish adolescents aged 12 to 16 perceive the television program “Proyecto Bullying”, which addresses school bullying through real-life testimonials. According to researchers Casas-Moreno, Caldeiro-Pedreira, and Romero-Rodríguez, audiovisual content can enhance empathy and awareness among teens but also reveals gaps in emotional readiness and social intervention.
Why is it important?
The main findings indicate that teens recognize the severity of bullying, but many still show emotional vulnerability and avoid active involvement. Gender, age, and region affect these perceptions, underscoring the need for targeted media education.
How is it applied?
Television can act as a preventive tool when integrated into media literacy curricula, especially if students are encouraged to reflect and act upon what they see. Programs like “Proyecto Bullying” show potential, but require structured guidance to maximize impact.
What Teens See and Feel: A Regional and Gender Analysis
Social Adjustment and Emotional Engagement
According to the research, girls showed greater emotional involvement and empathy toward victims, with higher willingness to face and overcome the issue. Boys were more likely to express detachment or fear of retaliation.
Age played a significant role: older teens (15–16) were more proactive, while younger ones (12–13) often expressed helplessness or denial.
Victim and Aggressor Roles: How Teens Identify
The results highlight a clear empathic alignment with victims, particularly among girls. Conversely, boys were more likely to polarize the role of the aggressor, labeling them as “bad people” or “mentally unstable.”
Badajoz, a southern Spanish city, showed the highest empathy, while northern regions like Pamplona reflected more emotional distancing.
Media Literacy: Hope or Hesitation?
Positive Reactions
The most recurring code among interviewees was “seeking solutions”, with teens expressing ideas like peer solidarity, parental involvement, and speaking out.
Negative Framing
Yet, there were 185 mentions of helplessness, with phrases like “I only intervene if it doesn’t affect me,” showing the emotional and social limits teens perceive when confronting bullying.
The Bullying Narrative: Values and Perceptions
Only 3 out of 1200 coded responses reflected positive framing of bullying, all from male students. The rest emphasized suffering, fear, and injustice, confirming that bullying is overwhelmingly seen as a negative, harmful phenomenon.
This highlights an opportunity: if media content is already interpreted negatively, it can be used as a starting point for deeper reflection and behavior change.
FAQs
Can TV programs really prevent bullying?
Yes, if supported by educational interventions and discussions that help teens process and reflect on the content.
Do boys and girls respond differently?
Yes. Girls tend to show more empathy and action-oriented thinking, while boys are more prone to emotional detachment or fear.
Is media literacy enough?
Media literacy is essential, but must be paired with school, family, and community support systems for real behavioral change.
Final Thoughts
This article demonstrates that television, when paired with critical media education, can be a valuable tool in the fight against bullying. The study of Spanish adolescents’ reactions to “Proyecto Bullying” reveals both potential and limits: while many teens express awareness, only structured support will turn concern into action.
Programs like these should not be censored, but rather integrated into a broader educational strategy to empower students, foster empathy, and build safer school environments.
de Casas-Moreno, P., Caldeiro Pedreira, M. C., & Romero-Rodríguez L. M. (2018). La televisión como espejo de la realidad del «bullying». Percepciones de los adolescentes sobre el programa «Proyecto Bullying». Aula Abierta, 47(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.47.2.2018.193-202