Competencias mediáticas para la ciudadanía
en maestros de América andina: Colombia y Ecuador
Media Education for Teachers in Colombia and Ecuador: Challenges and Solutions
What is it?
This article explains the current state of media education among teachers in two Andean countries—Colombia and Ecuador. Based on a comparative study by Rivera-Rogel et al., the research evaluates the media competencies of educators using a six-dimensional framework, revealing urgent gaps and actionable opportunities.
Why is it important?
The main findings indicate that teachers are digitally active but critically passive. While they use technology, they lack the training to analyze, produce, and ethically engage with media content. This weakens their role in fostering digital citizenship and democratic awareness among students.
How is it applied?
By adopting the Ferrés & Piscitelli model, education ministries and universities can implement comprehensive training programs to build skills in media language, technology use, critical reception, production, ideological analysis, and aesthetics.
Six Dimensions That Define Media Competency
The study assessed teachers in both message reception and production across six pillars:
-
Media Language: Recognizing and using symbolic codes
-
Technology: Operating devices and digital platforms effectively
-
Reception: Critically understanding and interpreting messages
-
Production: Creating ethical, meaningful content
-
Ideology and Values: Identifying bias, promoting diversity
-
Aesthetics: Valuing narrative and visual design
Findings at a Glance
Medellín, Colombia
-
Teachers were more confident in language and technology, but lacked critical and ideological analysis.
-
Only 8% scored high in content production, indicating a passive media role.
-
Aesthetic awareness was below medium in most cases.
Loja and Zamora, Ecuador
-
Better at handling digital tools, but struggled with media interpretation.
-
Over 80% failed to manage privacy settings or recognize stereotypes.
-
Teachers were familiar with regulatory frameworks, but unaware of ethical codes.
What This Means for Education
The results expose a paradox: teachers who use digital tools daily are not prepared to guide students in navigating complex media environments. This gap hinders the development of critical thinking, civic engagement, and ethical media use in schools.
FAQs
Is this a technology problem?
No. The problem lies in the critical and ethical dimensions of media—not device usage.
Why focus on teachers?
Because they are the first line of defense against misinformation and essential to fostering informed digital citizens.
What training do teachers need?
Programs that combine media analysis, production, ethical reflection, and use of digital platforms in a pedagogically meaningful way.
Final Thoughts
This study makes one thing clear: media literacy cannot be left to chance. Teachers must be trained not just to use media—but to understand it, critique it, and teach it.
The path forward includes institutional support, updated curricula, and continuous professional development. In Colombia and Ecuador—and across Latin America—empowering teachers is the first step toward building a critical and resilient media culture.
Rivera-Rogel, D., Zuluaga-Arias, L., Montoya-Ramírez, N., & Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., (2017). Competencias mediáticas para la ciudadanía en maestros de América andina: Colombia y Ecuador. Páideia, 27(66), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272766201710